Interac U-Innovate Challenge

Imagine the future of commerce powered by intelligent systems, where payments are seamless, secure and designed around real human needs.

Traduire la page

Evaluation Criteria

Submissions will be judged in both Round 1 and Round 2 of the Challenge by a panel of judges (“Judging Panel”) based on the following criteria:

 
Judging Criteria 
Description 
Weight
(%)
Rating Scale 

Problem Framing & Narrative 

Clarity and relevance of the problem definition; storytelling and context provided. 

15 

1–10 

Strategic Alignment 

How well does the solution align with Interac’s vision, mission and/or challenge goals and priorities. 

10 

1–10 

Technical Understanding & Execution 

Practicality and technical soundness of the solution; clear understanding and realistic execution. 

15 

1–10 

Implementation & Financial Analysis 

Depth of implementation plan steps and accuracy of financial planning, budgeting, and cost-benefit analysis. 

10 

1–10 

Innovation & Creativity 

Originality and inventiveness of the idea; does it challenge norms or offer a fresh perspective? 

15 

1–10 

Impact & Value 

Potential for short-term and long-term impact; value to stakeholders or society. 

15 

1–10 

Presentation, Group Participation & Clarity 

Effectiveness of communication from all group members, visuals, and overall presentation delivery. 

10 

1–10 

Quality of Research 

Competitive analysis, use of credible sources, data, and evidence to support the solution and problem framing. 

10 

1–10 

 

The Judging Panel’s decisions are final and binding without right of appeal.