Interac U-Innovate Challenge
Imagine the future of commerce powered by intelligent systems, where payments are seamless, secure and designed around real human needs.
Translate this page
Evaluation Criteria
Submissions will be judged in both Round 1 and Round 2 of the Challenge by a panel of judges (“Judging Panel”) based on the following criteria:
Judging Criteria |
Description |
Weight(%) |
Rating Scale |
|
Problem Framing & Narrative |
Clarity and relevance of the problem definition; storytelling and context provided. |
15 |
1–10 |
|
Strategic Alignment |
How well does the solution align with Interac’s vision, mission and/or challenge goals and priorities. |
10 |
1–10 |
|
Technical Understanding & Execution |
Practicality and technical soundness of the solution; clear understanding and realistic execution. |
15 |
1–10 |
|
Implementation & Financial Analysis |
Depth of implementation plan steps and accuracy of financial planning, budgeting, and cost-benefit analysis. |
10 |
1–10 |
|
Innovation & Creativity |
Originality and inventiveness of the idea; does it challenge norms or offer a fresh perspective? |
15 |
1–10 |
|
Impact & Value |
Potential for short-term and long-term impact; value to stakeholders or society. |
15 |
1–10 |
|
Presentation, Group Participation & Clarity |
Effectiveness of communication from all group members, visuals, and overall presentation delivery. |
10 |
1–10 |
|
Quality of Research |
Competitive analysis, use of credible sources, data, and evidence to support the solution and problem framing. |
10 |
1–10 |
The Judging Panel’s decisions are final and binding without right of appeal.